patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

DA: Police Bullet Killed Innocent Neighbor at Jefferson on the Creek

Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler calls the actions by police 'excusable' and says he will not seek to prosecute the officers.

 

Bucks County District Attorney David Heckler said 89-year-old Marie Zienkewicz died being a good neighbor.

In a press conference Thursday afternoon, Heckler said Zienkewicz opened her door to help her neighbor during a shootout between police and Andrew Cairns when she was hit by a bullet fired from a police rifle 

The woman Heckler said Zienkewicz was trying to help, Deborah Silva, was the girlfriend of Cairns. Heckler said Cairns fired at least 19 rounds at officers who were responding to a call from Silva to their apartment at the Jefferson on the Creek complex.

LISTEN: to portions of Deborah Silva's 911 calls from the night of the shooting.

Heckler said police believed it was Cairns emerging from the apartment when Zienkewicz opened her door.  

"Under these circumstances, I don't believe it would be proper to prosecute the police officer who fired the shot, and I will not do so," said Heckler. "Although, certainly, the result is tragic."

WATCH: DA David Heckler talk about the "perfect storm of events" surrounding the shooting. 

Cairns is currently being held at the Bucks County Correctional Facility on bail of $10 million. Thursday morning he was arraigned on an additional charge of criminal homicide, for the death of Zienkewicz. 

VIEW: Photos from the District Attorney's investigation into the shooting. 

Heckler said Cairns was given the added charge of criminal homicide based on the legal principal of transferred intent.

“[Cairns] is ultimately responsible for the deadly consequences of the chain of events which he began,” he said.  ““[Cairns] is responsible for Mrs. Zienkewicz ‘s death on the basis of his intentional acts to harm the police."

Related Content:

Related Topics: Andrew Cairns, Marie Zienkewicz, Warminster Police Department, jefferson on the creek, and warminster

Lu

4:16 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

This is pathetic that again the warminster police show poor shooting skills. The fact that they did not remove the folks in the area shows poor judgement. But then to shoot an innocent person, pathetic. Take away the guns, he also shot a stray bullet into another woman's home! If they do not have better aim, take the gun away until they practice and pass tests quarterly. Thank god I moved out of there, the corruption is unbelievable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:08 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

You are pathetic! You don't want the cops to have guns! Hope no one shoves a gun in your face and you want help! Obviously, the DA's office doesn't think they did anything wrong! But you know better than the DA right!

Comment_arrow

Bobz

7:53 am on Saturday, March 9, 2013

anonymous wrote:

"You are pathetic! You don't want the cops to have guns! Hope no one shoves a gun in your face and you want help! Obviously, the DA's office doesn't think they did anything wrong! But you know better than the DA right!"

You really do need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills. Lu posted that the police need to have their guns taken away IF they can't do better than to hit targets that ARE NOT the correct targets. Lu also referenced a stray bullet from a police officer ending up in a neighbor's house across Street Rd. Also if someone shoves a gun in my face in Warminster, it seems like there is a good chance I will be just as likely be shot by a Warminster police officer as the perp who pulled the gun on me.

And yes, apparently Lu and many others know better than the DA since this qualifies as an incompetent, reckless, negligent use of deadly force which is prosecutable under the laws of our state and country. Hopefully, the FBI will investigate these circumstances and bring charges in federal court, we also need to also look into removing Dave Heckler from office for allowing innocent citizens' deaths at the hands of law enforcement without repercussions. BTW, Elaine Benes, not every sentence ends in an exclamation point.

Comment_arrow

Nicholas C Hillman

4:09 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

Libertarian Party of Bucks is starting a petition. Cause the D.A says this is excusable which it is not. www.buckslp.org
http://warminster.patch.com/blog_posts/libertarians-say-feb-19th-shooting-shouldnt-be-excused-by-the-da

vist them on Facebook as well

Comment_arrow

Joe Schmoe

11:54 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Wow. The sheer stupidity in this post is apparent. Your logic is kinda like saying "Take water hoses from the fire fighters". They do have to go to a range yearly, and do pass a test. Just because one cop screws up, you don't have to go and blame the entire god damn department and accuse them of not knowing how to fire a weapon.

Comment_arrow

JBurress

11:17 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

anonymous, I believe you are pathetic (and a very sad person in general.) You show no remorse that an innocent person was shot and killed.

Kelly

5:07 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

No ones aim is perfect when being shot at. She was only a few feet away. It's not like they showed up and decided to start shooting at the building. They were using self defense when the psycho started shooting at them. Corruption? Really? Wake up buddy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JOE MAC

4:00 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

try living there and worry about a cop who cant shoot and a stray bullet hits you in the shoulder or your head or your mom or even your pet....you wake up!!!! where do you live in lala land

steve

5:52 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

a rifle????,,I could understand if it were a handgun.....but a rifle you must AIM..

Reply

john fitzgerald

5:54 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Deborah Silva had called the police to report that Andrew Cairns was threatening suicide. It is sad that he did not accomplish his goal and that Marie Zienkewicz was killed because she was a good neighbor. If Cairns killed himself, there would have been no firefight and no standoff. He would have saved a decent person's life and eliminated himself.

Reply

Tired of Hypocrisy

5:59 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

The gunman should be charged for the death of the neighbor. If there were such a thing, his 'girlfriend' should be charged with stupidity. She had the police at the apartment earlier in the day, she should have pressed charges or left him then. Instead she goes back in, they continue to drink and it escalates into a neighbor being killed, hundreds of police, E.T.'s, etc., spending a night trying to protect the neighbors & capture her idiot boyfriend. In fact, she should not have dropped the charges in Philly 6 years ago against him & no one would have been subject to the terro that evening. I hope the woman thinks her gnorance was worth it in the end. May the neighbor rest in peace, the gunman rot in hell & the girlfriend grow up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:17 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

He is being charged! I said in a comment earlier, that even if the police had accidentally shot the woman, that he would be charged with her death! He facilitated this chain of events and indirectly was responsible for her death!

Comment_arrow

JOE MAC

4:12 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

yeah they are both losers but as a officer of the law you need to be trained to deal in a crisis mode...you have no idea what even happened and your opinion is worthless maybe if you get hit by a stray bullet from the law you would change your stupid opinion

Comment_arrow

JBurress

11:34 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

anonymous, even though Cairns is being charged he did not shoot her. The police did. Both should be charged.

john fitzgerald

7:04 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

And now for more breaking news in Warminster...During the week of March 25, Pennsylvania Dog Wardens will be canvassing homes in the Warminster Township area. All dogs must be licensed and vaccinated against rabies. Violators can be cited with a maximum fine of $300 per violation plus court fees. DO NOT OPEN YOUR DOOR. THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER YOUR PREMISES
UNLESS THEY HAVE A SEARCH WARRANT. Local PD have nothing better to do than harass lawbiding citizens. I have license and vaccinations for my pets but will not be inviting the dog warden in for tea! They can check with the Bucks County Treasurer who issued these licenses. They do not need to bang at my door. Just do something more useful to keep the township safe. There is no rabies epidemic among the canine population here so it isn't a public health issue either. Go chase the rabid racoons out there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:02 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

That is not the issue that this article is about!

Kirk B

7:56 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

So the officer that actually killed the woman is not likely to face any punishment but the guy is getting charged with homicide??? I'm not saying the guy shouldn't be charged with something for creating a dangerous situation like that but for God's sake, how does a trained officer shoot the wrong person in a case like this. I'll tell you how, the officer done f'ed up. That's how. My GRANDMOTHER taught me about gun safety for goodness sake. Even she knew that before you pull the trigger you have to A) be sure of your target and B) be sure of your backstop so you don't hit anything behind your target. Certainly a trained officer of the law should know at least as much as my grandmother, wouldn't you think???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tired of Hypocrisy

9:37 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

With respect to you, did your grandmother also teach you A) when being shot at, stand there and take the bullet, B) stand and think for a few minutes while the bullets are coming at you what you should do C) not to Monday morning quarterback when you have never been in the position the police were thrust into that day D) realize that no police officer wakes up in the morning hoping to shoot anyone E) most if not all police officers wake up, along with their family, not knowing if that will be their final day caused by the bullet from a criminal.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:42 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Why would he face punishment for an accident! It's not a criminal act, if it's an accident! Deaths happen everyday due to accidents! They would have to build lots of prisons if every one was locked up every time their was a death due to an accident! Unless, it was willful or negligent,there is no crime to charge him with! Maybe you should brush up on your knowledge of criminal law!

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

12:40 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013

An accident is when a gun goes off unintentionally and someone is injured. When a gun is aimed and fired before the target is identified, it is negligent or reckless. You decide which.

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

2:31 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013

@ Tired... your comments A and B require no answer because they are not based in any type of reality, C it doesn't take much to know that collateral damage of this type is acceptable by any means, D is a magnificent statement of the obvious and E has no bearing on the situation. I understand fully that cops are human too and humans make mistakes. Sometimes REAL BIG ones. But humans regardless of their professions are usually held accountable for their mistakes on some level. You can read my comments below regarding my opinion on accountability. It pretty much sums up what I have to say on the matter.

Comment_arrow

JBurress

11:40 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

anonymous, people make mistakes and have accidents at their job everyday and are often reprimanded or fired. This accident resulted in the death of an innocent, elderly woman. That's an extremely serious "accident." No punishment? What exactly is your idea of justice for a person that was shot to death who did absolutely nothing wrong?

Kirk B

8:38 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Accountability. If I am subject to be held to it, I want to see it from lawmakers and law enforcers as well. Criminal negligence is what this officer should be facing at the very least.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:48 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

The DA didn't find him criminally negligent! I guess you can't read! You were not involved with the investigation so how can you make such an erroneous statement!

Comment_arrow

Abar Guy

5:29 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Yes, agree. He should not have discharged his weapon, knowing there were more innocents in an apartment complex than assailants without first identifying his target. That is his job and his responsibility!

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

12:33 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013

anonymous, you do understand what an opinion is right? I just expressed mine.

Comment_arrow

JOE MAC

4:26 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

he should be charged for being a so called sniper for shooting a lady for no reason. why was she not told to leave her apartment when they made over 50 people leave and closed down a whole shopping center. Why cant they just admit they fuckrd up and the idiot who shot at the lady probably 20 times. He must need glasses did his gun have a scope??? i dont think he was 100 yards away but then again its all political bullshit. At the very least suspend him for a year and make him take target practice 24 hours a day

J.J.B.

9:09 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Just because the DA isn't pressing charges against the officer doesn't mean Ms. Zienkewicz's family won't.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:54 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

That is true! I am sure that they will try and sue the police in civil court! Why more people aren't outraged at this drunken mental case who caused this mess is beyond me!

Comment_arrow

JOE MAC

4:34 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

Her family will for sure get alot of money from this stupid shooting death but of course we will not hear that part of it...They can buy anyone off with the fines they charge for a taillight out or going thru a yelow light. That liar corrupt D.A. Heckler can pay it himself im sure he has alot of pocket change

Comment_arrow

JBurress

11:43 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

anonymous, they will not "try" and sue the police in civil court they will sue and they will win. Cops screwed up in the worst way possible.

Kirk B

9:11 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

^^^ Agreed but there's enough to warrant criminal charges here imho, not just civil charges.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:56 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Well your opinion is wrong! I guess you can't read either!

Comment_arrow

anonymous

4:17 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

That's right! You're the same guy!

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

12:34 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013

I am the same guy and it appears that you still have no concept of what an opinion is.

Comment_arrow

JBurress

1:12 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

anonymous, technically an opinion can not be right or wrong. It is what somebody believes. Also, if Kirk B couldn't read he would not be able to reply to your post, as it would mean he probably couldn't write, either.

Kirk B

10:08 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013

^^^See what I mean? Human mistake. That was supposed to be "UNacceptable." My bad, I'll take full responsibility for that typo.

Reply

anonymous

2:56 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Why can't people except the fact that the police did nothing criminal in their actions!Their attempt and eventual success in apprehending this gun shooting drugged up drunk saved more innocent people from getting hurt! It's unfortunate what happened but the woman made the decision on her own to be brave like those cops and try and save some one! They are all heroes! This article is only a summary of the investigation and I am sure there are many points in detail, that led to the DA's decision not to charge the police officer! If every time an cop had to worry about being charged for doing his job to the best of his ability in a situation such as this! No one would want to be a cop! Then who would show up at your door when your screaming for help! Then, those of you, who would never put your lives on the line for someone that you don't even know and then be second guessed and ridiculed for your bravery.....would all be whining! It's a tough enough profession to work the long hours,through the night,weekends and holidays and not being with your family at functions! It doesn't pay all that great either! You take constant crap from people who get pissed off cause they receive a ticket or get arrested for doing something illegal! But instead of taking responsibility, it's easier to pass blame on the officers who try and protect you and your family, everyday, all day! It's a thankless job! But my husband loves what he does and feels that he does make a difference!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirk B

11:45 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

"...But my husband loves what he does and feels that he does make a difference!" I might have surmised this given the emotional, rather than rational, nature of your responses. Now I see why you might have a problem looking at this situation objectively.

I don't think the majority of people commenting on this story are cop haters in general, I do think they are tired of ineptitude and the lack of culpability surrounding our law makers and law enforcement. Obviously it's a tough job and I doubt many here would have what it takes to be a cop, but when the power that is given the police is wielded irresponsibly or recklessly, there should be accountability similar to what a civilian would face in the same situation. You can't just shoot an innocent bystander and not expect there to be repercussions. That kind of collateral damage cannot be tolerated. You should know as well as anyone that this exact type of scenario is what police are supposed to trained to handle. I mean, Hogan's Alley type training has been in existence for how long? Or is that not part of the training regimen these days?

Comment_arrow

Bobz

3:28 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013

The cop that shot Marie Zienkewicz is no hero, he's an incompetent, trigger happy dufus for being unable to tell the difference between a 42 yr. old man and an 89 yr. old woman and using deadly force based on faulty judgement. The cops saved more innocent people from being hurt? FYI the worst person hurt during this incident was Marie Zienkewicz who was shot and killed by a cop, not anyone else. You suffer from some ridiculous notions about reality. Some stupid idiot cop who has no business carrying a weapon let alone discharging it into an innocent person because he didn't know what he was doing makes ALL of us unsafe. Just because he has a lame excuse doesn't absolve him of his negligent, reckless actions that resulted in an innocent bystander's death. Being a cop is a thankless job? They get thanked every time they get paid, provided with benefits like vacation, holiday, sick pay, insurance and, when they retire, with a pension. If they don't like that or feel the pressure of the job is too much then why not opt for the private sector and slug it out with all the other civilians in the tough economy? I'm tired of people like you feeling special because your spouse is a cop, here's the downside, when they screw up as royally as this officer, the repercussions are that much heavier, comes with the territory, not everyone can handle it. One thing's for sure, Marie Zienkewicz deserved better than that unidentified officer gave her with his reckless actions.

Comment_arrow

JOE MAC

4:45 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

shut up dumb fuck if your mom got shot for no reason you would change your story fast. You dont have a clue what the whole story is. Im not putting down the police they just need to admit they made a huge mistake and need more training in a crisis situation...not to mention one of your finest officers shot a bullet across street road into someones living room and went thru to the bedroom...you are an idiot if that was your place try saying the same thing moron

Comment_arrow

Pete Krenshaw

9:18 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

JOE MAC - you sure do like to curse a lot which does not make your arguments any more correct. By the way, the bullet which went across street road was not from a cop. It was from Cairns and it was one of over a dozen he shot.

Comment_arrow

JBurress

11:52 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

anonymous, to refer to the officer who shot the innocent, unarmed elderly woman to death as a hero...in the future please count to ten before you speak your mind and think of what you are going to say.

Year of the rabbit

7:21 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Adrenaline was the likely cause of this officer discharging his weapon.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirk B

11:47 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Agreed, I'm sure it played a huge role. Which is exactly why police are supposed to train for situations like this: so that they can make the right decision under bad circumstances.

Tony

9:54 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

I am not defending Cairns actions or involvement in any way but it is ridiculous that he is being charged for an over eager police officer. It does not say in the article that the officer was not hitting where he was aimed. It says they thought it was Cairns and I quote "Heckler said police believed it was Cairns emerging from the apartment when Zienkewicz opened her door." You do not shoot until you have properly identified your target. This was not an accident caused by Cairns, this was someone not following a standard protocol for police, military and any other gun user

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirk B

11:49 am on Friday, March 8, 2013

Cairns did create the situation and I believe there should be some type of charges as a result. But to charge him with homicide while excusing the PD of all responsibility is way wrong imho.

Pete Krenshaw

1:36 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013

I believe this story is far from over with more details yet to be revealed. Obviously it is a tragedy an innocent life was lost. I would personally like to know more about how the wrong door was targeted. One of the published news articles indicates an officer previously responding to the domestic disturbance call earlier in the day identified the far right door as the target. Also, what about lighting and protocol of identifying target before firing a shot? I still believe there is more to this and am not willing to vilify the actions of the police. I have to believe the DA and his team who have access to this information are making the correct decision. Once Cairns trial goes to court, I am sure the details will come out.

Reply

Jim Peters

12:25 am on Saturday, March 9, 2013

The cop was probably using an assault rifle.Those are so evil,they have a mind of thier own.It's not the shooter's fault,it's the weapon's.However, the free pass on shooting noncombatants would make it easy to clear our streets of nondesirables.Have a staged fire-fight and cleanup the drug dealers etc. that the courts can't or won't touch.It would make DA Heckler's job easier;less court cases.

Reply

Bill Sams

8:05 am on Saturday, March 9, 2013

If you can't see who or what you are aiming at,,, Don't Shoot.. Especially at a person who isn't a target to begin with. Why was not the Door identified and why wasn't the occupants gotten safely out???? Warminster Police need to be sent back to Police training.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirk B

9:55 am on Saturday, March 9, 2013

From what I read, the gunman fired on officers as they arrived, so they may not have had an opportunity to clear the area. All the more reason to be sure of your target before you shoot if you ask me.

World Peace

12:24 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

The cop should be discharged immediately. They are trained for incidents like this and obviously he was trigger happy. In the Intel it said "he thought" it was Cairns exiting the building. Really?? You can't tell the difference between an elderly woman and a 50 something year old man? Totally unaccetpable. We don't need police like that in Warminster. Get rid of him. I will be at the next township meeting and hope others follow to get this cop off the Warminster Police Department.

Reply

dawa

3:28 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

Shooting into a multifamily occupied building with paper thin walls is a no brainer. Only a scared idiot, not a trained law officer would do such a thing. Let's hope the guy with the rifle who is unnamed is not the designated sniper for the Warminster police dept.

Reply

animalcrackrz

8:52 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013

As a 12 year old novice hunter, number one lesson,always know what your shooting at before you pull the trigger. Lesson two, always know what is beyong your target before you pull the trigger. If we make mistakes in life we must correct them or pay for thoses mistakes. Unless your a trigger happy police officer who kill's an innocent bystander.

Reply

Barney Sloan

10:27 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013

Too all the DA said the police officer purposely shot at the door of the neighbor as it openned thinking it was the gunman. He never identified who was openning the door before openning fire. He should be disciplined for his actions as he is required to identify a target and not shot indiscriminately. This is the second incident in recent years where the Warminster police have fired bullets which hit other buildings and now a person who was not the target. They need to be disciplined and taught how to handle a gun in a high pressure situation.

Reply

K. Thom.

10:32 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013

The police cannot protect you. They can only respond to your calls for help. They are the second responders, you are the first responder.
When the police come under fire the first action should be to take cover and assess the situation(situational awareness) If necessary return fire at a designated target not just a building or window. If they can't see their actual target don't shoot(yes there would be exceptions to this but not in an apartment setting like this). If I may "If we could only save one life" we should ban all police shootings. If this had been a law abiding citizen protecting his home at night and fired shots at an intruder and one of the rounds went through a wall and killed a neighbor you would surely have seen charges pending but not the thin blue line nope they get to walk away

Reply

Carl W

5:04 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013

A lot of comments, for such little information. I'd recommend outside investigation. I feel sad for the officer, however, he did kill an innocent woman. Can't say, "Oh well," & jusrt let it go. DID he/she exercise proper judgement? Time for look by State Police, PA. Justice Dept, (or F.B.I). "Adminsitrative leave" until finished!!

Reply

Keeping it real

5:20 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013

Everyone needs to stop blaming the police for this. That officer will have to live with this for the rest of his life and that will not be easy. They did the best they could with a bad situation. The door opened and they took thier shot, being under fire and a confusion of door numbers sucks! This situation wouldn't of gotten this far if the 2 in a sick relationship got help! The police should start doing gun checks if called out to a domestic situation and remove ALL guns found in the home for at least 90 days. IF THERE IS GUNS IN YOUR HOME, AND SOMEONE WHO IS IN A BAD MENTAL STATE........ GET THE GUNS OUT!

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Q

10:46 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013

The officer who fired the shots should be fired and replaced. The DA's findings, while legal, show a growing trend where officers are being held unaccountable for their actions. It seems every time an officer screws up there is a lengthy investigation done, not to determine the facts but how to best cover up the officer's actions and find him/her at no fault. It's getting ridiculous. These are county employees and if they cannot satisfy their job requirements then let them go.

anonymous

5:03 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

An officer has the right to defend himself when he is being shot at! That's what they are taught in the police academy! If all of you idiots had looked at the diagram that the DA released, it clearly shows a bullet landed in close proximity to the right of him and one to the left. He was over 100 yards away in order to try and be at a safe distance. Several trees were positioned in front of the complex where the shooter resided, plus it was at dusk. When that door started to open he had every right to return fire with the reasonable expectation that it was Cairn's! It's the door next to his apartment and who in their right mind would open their door when hearing gunshots! It is absolutely understandable that he would have thought that it was the shooter! He does not have to wait to be shot at again! Many crazies like to go out by ( suicide by cop)! The officer did what was necessary to defend himself! The elderly woman took the risk by opening her door to Cairn's girlfriend! Yes, it's tragic but it is not criminal! Did you hear of anyone else opening their doors during the shootout? No! Of course not! The cops didn't pick the apartment complex to have a shootout, the drunken neighbor did! If you listen to the 911 tapes the girlfriend was drunk and of no assistance to the police as far as helping with information! You can train from now till doomsday and you could have 1000 different scenarios play out! Like the DA said it was a perfect storm! So get over it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Devon Van Horn

4:44 pm on Thursday, March 14, 2013

"Did you hear of anyone else opening their doors during the shootout? No! Of course not!" - actually, yes. I live in the building to the left and several of my neighbors were in fact stepping outside throughout the evening. Curiousity as to what was being heard made them come outside. Some people were completely unaware and attempted to go to work and since the police didn't feel it was important to inform anyone in the direct vicinity what was happening, the neighbor stepping outside isn't as far out there as you seem to believe it is. As I stated on a previous board, the residents were not informed as to what was going on. Gun shots could be misinterpreted as sounding like something else, especially if you don't expect there to be a gun fight outside of your apartment and especially if you are not used to hearing gun shots.

Comment_arrow

JBurress

12:03 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

anonymous, the officer, as you stated, was over 100 yards away, at dusk, with trees blocking his view. So how could he identify his target before he fired his weapon?

anonymous

5:26 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

Don't think the DA's office would not have gone after that cop if he had been negligent! If you read the article in the Patch from March 1....Officer Schmalz of Warminster P.D. was acquitted of charges stemming from an incident last July. The DA office went after him 3 times to no prevail!!! So stop saying that the DA would cover up for the cops!!!! You have no frickin' clue what you are talking about! You are just pissed that the officer isn't getting charged! Cause you want to blame the cops for everything, because you have some kind of hang up towards the police!!! Other wise you would be blaming the a**hole who caused this mess not the men and women who protect your butts!!!! When someone is shooting up your neighborhood do us all a favor don't call the cops...handle it yourself!!!! Would love to see how that would work for you!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

dawa

1:24 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

You obviously are in some way connected to a police department either in uniform or a family member.

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

7:33 pm on Friday, March 15, 2013

@ dawa, anonymous is married to a cop. I am quite sure, given the level of intellectual content of her posts that he is relieved that she is posting anonymously.

John Q

11:53 am on Monday, March 11, 2013

"Officer Schmalz of Warminster P.D. was acquitted of charges stemming from an incident last July. The DA office went after him 3 times to no prevail!!!"

The discussion is not about Schmalz. Completely irrelevant. This is a far more serious case. But your right. The DA failed in that case just he did in this one.

"You have no frickin' clue what you are talking about! You are just pissed that the officer isn't getting charged! Cause you want to blame the cops for everything, because you have some kind of hang up towards the police!!!"

Never said the officer should be criminally charged. Said he should be fired and replaced. I also have no hang up towards the police, just think they should be called out when they do a p*ss poor job. They are, after all civil servants.

"When someone is shooting up your neighborhood do us all a favor don't call the cops...handle it yourself!!!! Would love to see how that would work for you!!!!"

That's an idiotic statement. Go calm down. Maybe make yourself a nice sandwich and a glass of milk to go with your meds.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

4:34 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

i know this isn't about Schmalz. it was a point that I was making. Regarding those who have commented, that the DA's office would some how cover up for a police officer who has committed a crime! Obviously that is not the case!

Comment_arrow

anonymous

5:03 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

If he hasn't committed a crime then he legally cannot be terminated! It was deemed an accident! Plain and simple! There are laws that protect workers in the work place, right! Aren't you protected? If you work! If he was fired he could and would sue the township and would win! He would be reinstated and get back pay on top of it! Are you in a high risk profession? Probably not! That's why you have so much to say about those who do!

Comment_arrow

anonymous

5:11 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

i don't need meds! I just give it back to jerks like you! But i think you do!!!! For your superiority complex!

Comment_arrow

google that

5:12 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Anonymous- I work in a hospital were we need to make quick actions that mean life or death some times. If we cause harm to our pt. then we are fined or fired, very few times are we exampt from our mistakes. But my question to the DA is why are we not looking into this more? Why just say that this is excusable? When a mistake is made in a hospital they examin it and try to insure it never happens again

Comment_arrow

anonymous

6:28 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

@ google that.... in law enforcement you have to be able to prove negligence. Under the law, criminal negligence does not apply in this case! The DA has years of experience in criminal law, as a DA, ,and judge, i think he knows how to interpret it! Those who know nothing about criminal law have so much to say but nothing to back it up with! They are simply emotional responses! Many have been very hateful and nasty! Coming from a law enforcement family it sickens me that very few of these blogs throw their anger at Mr. Cairn's! Where it should be! That's who they should blame! It doesn't matter in the eyes of the law,if he actually pulled the trigger that killed the woman! It's called transferred intent! Look it up! I have no problem seeing a rogue cop go to prison if he has done something criminal! They only make the good cops look bad anyway! I read an article in the Courier Times that is a little more in depth ( diagrams and all!) I believe that the DA made the right decision! This cop has to live with this for the rest of his life, live with that stress! Like the DA said, "it was a perfect storm" of events! Many factors were involved for things to go wrong! Mostly due to Cairn's and his girlfriend! The woman was also told by family in a phone conversation, to stay inside, she knew the risk! No one has the right to judge this cop, they weren't there! In the medical field, I am sure they have to prove that you are negligent too! They can't just fire you!

Comment_arrow

JBurress

12:13 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

anonymous, of course you agree with DA's decision. He found the cops (one of which is your husband) completely free of responsibility and legal repercussions. Your reply is self serving.

Nobody Business

2:41 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

No one held accountable , boy that is a shock.
Heck im surprised the cops didnt find (plant) a gun on the elderly lady

Reply

jeff bush

4:11 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

plus do favor dont walk into any church unless you are ready to admit to god you murdered one of his daughters. he'll only forgive you when you do..

Reply

jeff bush

7:02 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

john q really, use your real name and not one of a movie.

Reply

jeff bush

7:21 pm on Monday, March 11, 2013

joe mac, your a schmuck. a few years ago these cowboys lit a neighborhood. taking 160 shots, only hitting there target 7 times. where did the other 153 go? one was found above the headboard of an 8 yr old girl. what would you say if that bullit killed her. ooops. shhhh joe.

Reply

google that

7:48 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Anonymous - can you agree with me on the fact that this should be looked at and reviewed to see if there is a way to prevent this from happening again? ( or similar) What insets me is that the DA and local law enforcement not taking steps to make things better. All I see is them saying that this event is just something that happens. I hope you can understand my concern, I am not out for blood just a resolution to help our community.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:47 am on Monday, March 18, 2013

@google that...absolutely it should be looked at and reviewed. I can guarantee you that it will be! This may even be used some day in a training tape. Who knows! Law enforcement are sent to many schools and training seminars and look at real life situations such as this, to learn from. But there are no absolutes. No profession is infallible, even the medical field! You have to carry liability insurance don't you? As to your statement that the police and or DA's office is not taking steps to make things better is totally unfounded. You have no idea what they are doing or plan on doing in the future. I can tell you that they will certainly want to learn from this situation and find ways that they could have handled it better. I am sure that they are taking this very seriously! How could they not! A life was lost! But the bottom line is,,,, that the police officer did nothing criminal in the eyes of the law and some people just can't accept that. I do understand your concern....I am concerned too! Just because I come from a law enforcement family doesn't mean that I am blind. Bad cops should have their badges taken away and prosecuted if they have committed a crime. But that is not the case here! I actually have concerns for this officers safety! His name will probably be released at some point when the family files a civil suit. There are a lot of crazy cop haters out there. As demonstrated in some of the comments previously posted.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

4:28 am on Monday, March 18, 2013

In fact,it was stated in the Courier Times that Cairn's had a hatred for the police. I guess he was hoping to take one of them out with the 19 shots that he fired at them!

Comment_arrow

JBurress

12:20 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

anonymous, you guarantee that this case will be looked at and reviewed and they may go as far to use it a training tape. What is your position in life that you can offer such guarantees? Also you seriously believe that "possibly" including this incident in a training tape will be enough? Are you serious?

Kirk B

1:07 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Nothing like an unbiased opinion, eh anonymous? Just an FYI, you do realize that there is other punctuation on the keyboard other than an exclamation point, don't you? Try using some of the others for a change and you may not come across sounding quite so simple minded. Only a child speaks in the absolutes that you do. The blind faith you so conveniently place in the DA in this case is telling as well. Would you be so quick to support him if he was to investigate the officer that shot the innocent neighbor?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirk B

1:08 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Let me reiterate that: SHOT THE INNOCENT NEIGHBOR.

You do know what happens when someone gets shot right? It ain't like on tv where it's "BANG" and the bad guy drops dead instantly. It's horrific. The flesh is ripped apart, the bones are shattered and the victim's blood pours out onto the pavement. The mind reels in agony as they die, leaving behind their life, leaving behind their family and their friends to suffer with the memory of her injury and their loss.

THIS is what this "officer of the law" is responsible for. THIS is what he did to that woman. THIS is what he did to her family and friends. THIS is what he should be held accountable for.

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

1:10 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Now, as you type your single minded child like response, try to think about how you would feel if this was your mother, your sister, your child or your friend that this happened to. Ask yourself if you would still be so blindly faithful to the police or the DA. Ask yourself if you would not want justice to be served. And ask yourself, and answer honestly, if you would even want revenge?

You know as well as I do that due to your bias you will not be able to answer those questions honestly in this public forum but at least try to be honest with yourself. Maybe then your posts will begin to sound like those of a responsible adult, rather than those of an ignorant, immature, petulant, mouthy brat.

Like I said previously, I'll bet your husband is happy you choose to post anonymously.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

4:17 am on Monday, March 18, 2013

I don't need you to give me a lesson on what a person goes through when they are shot, stabbed etc. I have seen crime scene photos! I know! If anyone is bias it's you! You want this cop to go down just cause you think he should! You give nothing but totally unfounded and emotional comments! Go find some case law and go to the DA's office and show Heckler why his decision to not go after this cop criminally was wrong. Until you can do that you really have nothing to base your opinion on! If the only thing you can throw back at me is the fact that I use a lot of exclamation points then you really have nothing intelligent to add!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oops!!!!!! Did I use too many!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

JBurress

12:29 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

anonymous, anyone can see crime scene photos. Google crime scene photos under images. 100's pop up. If anyone is giving emotional comments it is you. Still not one sign of remorse for the poor women that was killed from you (only excuses) but from the way you act there is a lynch mob coming to attack the police. Also, say Kirk B did present case law and go to the DA's office and show Heckler why his decision to not go after this cop criminally was wrong. What exactly do you think Heckler would do? Sit down and have tea with him while they discussed it? Going through your ramblimgs I'm starting to feel sorry for your husband.

Joe Schmoe

1:42 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

You know, you people keep saying that the entire department needs to be sent back to training as a result of a mistake from one officer. One person said to take the guns away, which would be like saying "take the water hoses from the fire fighters". These officers are trained in these type of situations. How do we know that it wasn't a new cop that had never been in this type of situation before? We don't know who the officer was, and how new he was to the force. Also, if it was my grandmother that had gotten shot, I would be very upset and irate, but would understand the circumstances. I would also want the officer sent back to training, but not the entire force. That is ridiculous. You people need to stop arguing on a little website, and if you really want to make a difference, which you 99 percent most likely won't, go start protesting at the DA's office. That would get the point across. Not arguing on this website through a computer. Get up off of your lazy asses and do something about it if you think the officer should be charged.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirk B

2:42 pm on Saturday, March 16, 2013

You need to brush up on your reading comprehension before you start preaching to anyone else. How many people here are calling for the entire department to be retrained? One person did say take the guns away... "until they practice and pass tests" which, given recent events doesn't sound all that unreasonable. As far as arguing on a little website vs protesting the DA, who says the two are mutually exclusive? There's nothing wrong with people voicing their opinions here and I seriously doubt that any that are expect policy to be changed or an investigation to ensue solely based on their commentary. So don't worry about what folks are doing with their lazy asses, worry about what you do with your own. I am happy for you that you could be at peace with your grandmother losing her life due to an act of incompetence, but don't expect others to feel the same.

jrosa

11:57 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

i live two apts down from all this drama and i cant believe the andrews girlfriend still lives there it makes me sick and half the crap that is written in these comments about this are not even accurate i know because unlike 99 percent of you i was there heard phone call from the police and seen the shots watched the police did not get a phone call from plice or apt complex it was a free for all for the first hour the apts address's on there door are all wacky and the door the old lady was killed at is right under andrews window so it looks like its his door god only know why the old lady would open her door

Reply

anonymous

4:51 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

You are not going to get a personal phone call from the police in a situation like this. They don't have the time under the circumstances.They are worried about dealing with a crazy guy shooting a gun! I read that 911 was suppose to call ( they are not the police) and alert the public of the emergency at hand and tell you what to do. It supposedly is a very new concept and may have been used for the first time on that day.
I read that Cairn's girlfriend (when finally coaxed by the police, to come to them, after several attempts),never told the police that the old lady had been shot! Cairn's shot 19 times at the cops and the officer returned 4 shots when he saw the door start to open. The shots hit the door and the door frame. The gun shots had stopped and the police thought they had shot him. When they felt that it was safe enough to approach, that's when they realized they had shot the elderly woman! Cairn's girlfriend never breathed a word. I don't know how she could show her face!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Devon Van Horn

3:20 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I didn't need a personal phone call from the cops - but the few officers that were hanging out behind our cars could have taken a break from their personal convo and laughter (oh yes...this was happening) to let us know why they were there. Heck - even during the evacuation they could have answered questions...which they didn't... We did get a recorded and automated phone call about the pending evacuation - so I'm not too sure why someone (or whoever made that recording) couldn't have done one a few hours earlier to warn people.

Comment_arrow

JBurress

12:58 am on Saturday, March 23, 2013

anonymous, police had plenty of time to warn residents. First call regarding Cairns came in at 7:40pm and Cairns surrendered at approximately 2:30am. So, subtracting the time they arrived on the scene and when the shots were fired by police and Cairns there was about five and a half hours to alert the people in the complex.

anonymous

5:02 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Correction: The police weren't sure, until after the investigation, that the bullet that killed the woman, had come from them.

Reply

anonymous

5:27 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

I know that I would not have liked to have been stuck in my apartment for hours either! But what you think the cops should or shouldn't have been doing, doesn't matter. They were following procedure. Sorry that it wasn't to your liking. It's common sense to know, that if you hear gun shots coming from outside your home, that the safest place to be, is to stay put! Until the cops feel that it's safe to come out. I certainly don't need a cop to tell me why they are there. The cops are not going to bang on your door and everyone else's to inform you of the situation and take a chance at getting shot! If you asked them questions and they didn't tell you anything, did you ever think that there may have been a reason! If you are being evacuated, they want you out as fast as possible! They are not going to stand there and have a chit chat with you and the rest of the complex! They were there for hours, I guess they weren't allowed to talk to one another either? The next thing you will say is that how dare they have something to drink or be allowed to go to the bathroom. You are being very unfair. They were there to stop this guy and help you and everyone else in that complex to get out safely. Count your blessings and be thankful that you weren't hurt! This situation could have been a lot worse!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Devon Van Horn

8:51 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

This will be a multi-part reply. I didn't mind being in my apartment for hours - it was the uncertainty of our safety while being there. The fact remains as I have stated in the past either on this direct story or others related to it- some of our neighbors did not hear gun shots. They were hustled out of their homes with no explanation. We explained to one what was happening because the police ignored his questions and objections to leaving his animals behind believing it was just a gas leak. Also - the day after the events - I spoke with a deputy in a neighboring department and he confirmed that there is no procedure which would prevent them from informing the people what was going on around them. Also - during the evacuation my husband and I stood on our stoop with the officers discussing our cat in the bedroom and to not be alarmed if he jumped out at them. If it was so urgent and dangerous I would suspect they wouldn't have let us stand around on the step. Also - we stood there in the lot while they discussed the neighboring home which needed to use their own van to evacuate due to the physical and mental disabilities of those who lived there. We also casually followed another officer to the armored vehicle with no sense or urgency or even protection. So - you are wrong about your summations as you were not there and are not aware of how it was handled.

Comment_arrow

Devon Van Horn

8:52 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

And again - if the cops can laugh and goof off in the parking lot at 5 hours in - I'm not sure how letting us know what was happening could not have been any worse. Additionally - as quickly as possible? I don't believe 7 hours later is evacuating as quickly as possible. Nor can the standing around on our stoop be considered as quickly as possible. And I bet Marie didn't believe so either. You are correct - I should count my blessings that I was not shot by an overzealous police officer. And it wasn't that they were talking. They were standing around like we would at work around a water cooler. This was again, at 5 hours in and after they were being stealthy. I don't care if they have a drink or a bathroom break, that is ridiculous to suggest. you are too hot headed (and biased) to make rational arguments here. It's unfortunate that you believe that police are infallible. They are just humans - who made a terrible mistake and killed an innocent person. I wonder how many gun shots Marie had ever heard before in her life. How dare she not be certain? One man who had no idea what was going on got in his car to go to work and was threatened to be arrested. He didnt attempt to leave because he was a jerk - but because he had NO idea that the event was occurring. Just this week a man pulled a knife on his wife in our complex. Had it been a gun I can't help but wonder who else the police may have shot.

Comment_arrow

Devon Van Horn

8:52 am on Friday, March 22, 2013

We are moving back to my hometown next month - where the police are trusted, intelligent, and wait to fire...and I couldnt be more thrilled. But as I said - I do not hate police. I have been friends w several officers for years and am also related to cops. I just also expect that they uphold the law and are responsible w their weapons and power. If and when they are not - they should be held accountable...

jrosa

8:03 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

i was watching cairns apt since the first shot off my balcony i could see in his apt watching the place light up from the flash bang my windows ur open my family was eating dinner my chair faces the dining room window that faces cairns apt windows at the first shot and flash i carried my son to the bath tub and made him ly down and wife lied on the floor and i liad on the floor at the balcony sorry people but andrew did nt shoot 19 times i heard every shot fired and the police didnt shoot the old ladies door frame it was right in the center of the door chest high i walked past the door the nextnight to go to work and saw them by the time i got home is was boarded up and yes devon i also saw the police laughing and smiling as well by were humans he was caught he wasnt going anywhere all the extra police that were there not needed i'dbe bullshiting with my fellow officer too

Reply

Devon Van Horn

8:24 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

My only issue with them hanging out and joking around is that they were - according to anonymous - allegedly too busy to inform residents of what was going on. High stress times call for needed relief - I can understand that - but I added that point to address anonymous' claims that they were all too busy to communicate with the community. We also figured out on our own to turn off the lights and what not - but I didn't understand how the news was reporting that the police informed residents of what to do. I can't help but think the police released that they had done this to the news themselves. And yes - center of the door. I wasn't aware she opened the door - I had first heard that she was shot through her door. If that was the case, that would in my opinion fall under the moral penal code of not using deadly force with innocent bystanders in the immediate area. Even if she did open the door... It's just all a big shame...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary

7:10 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

I also live in these apartments and have to strongly agree that the least the police could do was inform us of what was going on and where the shots were being fired in the complex. When I asked what was going on I was yelled at to "get back in my apartment and stay there" by the police. Also, the end of January when the guy shot fires in the restaurant on County Line Rd. the police had these apartments blocked off and were running around with rifles right in front of my apartment. When they were leaving I asked what was going on and the officers reply was "solicitors". Glad they find it amusing, I don't.

anonymous

2:13 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

It makes me sick how you take your anger out on the wrong people! Cairn's is the bad guy here but yet you choose to blame the cops! Typical! Enough said on this story!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bobz

1:34 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

What makes me sick is the thought that people will stubbornly and wrong-headedly defend reckless and negligent behavior under color of law by mistake-prone people who are supposed to be trained professionals but whose actions show them to be more of a threat to the innocent citizens they are sworn to serve and who pay their salary. It's obvious that the decisions made that resulted in targeting and killing an innocent bystander in this situation were severely flawed. Screw-ups and extremely bad judgement by government employees that result in the death of an innocent person or people can not be tolerated. The people responsible, and some of the police most definitely should be held responsible for the horrible judgement used that caused Marie Zienkewicz's death, should be brought out in a full public disclosure of this incident to help insure precautions and new procedures are implemented to prevent such a tragedy from occurring in the future. At the very least the officer(s) responsible and whomever approved the firing of bullets at Marie Zienkewicz, should never be in a position to make decisions that might result in killing another innocent person ever again.

Devon Van Horn

3:02 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

Well since you said enough - I guess we are supposed to obey? Haha you are a joke. There's no anger being taken out on anyone. It wasn't my mother who was shot. It's concern as a citizen because she was a fellow citizen. It makes me sick that you are so blinded by your husband being a cop that you can't recognize an innocent life was lost due to carelessness and recklessness. I'm not the one who has to hide behind the badge for the rest of my life to justify taking someone else's. Sure cairns is responsible for what he did - but the cop who fired at the wrong door is also. If they were confused by the numbering even more reason to hold off on firing back. I will not understand trying to protect the citizens by killing one. As a trained officer they should have thought it was possible their bullet wouldnt travel directly to cairns. They should have considered the lives that they were just as guilty of putting in danger. That is a simple fact that you for some reason are ignoring. I wonder if it was in fact your husband who fired the fatal shot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bobz

1:53 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Well said Devon. Too often people think doctors and police officers walk on water, but the truth is they are just as human as the rest of us. These officers need to understand the power, tools, weapons and decisions they have available to them carry real world consequences. People like this cowardly anonymous poster who is vociferously defending extremely p*ss poor police work as just another day at the office, and deflecting criticism by pointing fingers at Cairns and making lame excuses is a slap in the face to all the citizens, especially those in Warminster Township and Bucks County who pay their salaries via our tax dollars. People like "anonymous" who answer criticism of the police tactics that resulted in the death of an innocent with "put on the uniform and do it yourself" ignore one fact: if I were the officer who was poised to fire those shots I would know I positively, 100% identified my target was the 42-year-old male perpetrator and not an innocent 89-year-old, elderly woman, which tragically that officer obviously did not do. But for some reason "anonymous" can't seem to wrap her brain around that simple fact, and the fact that deadly screw-ups carry dire consequences, the least of which should be finding a new line of work for the shooter since he is ill suited to his chosen profession of protecting the local citizenry as a law enforcement officer but whose faulty careless judgement is more of a threat to innocent people than a gun wielding drunken man.

Bobz

1:13 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Anonymous: None of the cops in Warminster are Jesus Christ or God so we can assume their fallibility and imperfection when it comes to making mistakes. Cairns will face criminal charges for his mistakes, the police were reckless and negligent and directly caused an innocent person's death, that at least should be investigated for criminally negligent homicide. In other words, being so brain dead they thought an 89-year-old woman somehow resembled a 42-year-old man when using deadly force, i.e. shooting a rifle at least four times, mistakenly targeting an innocent elderly woman with a bullet that caused her death.

If that isn't a negligent and reckless use of deadly force, then what is? At the very least this should go to the State Attorney General and FBI for further inquiry and possible charges against the offending officer. Use of deadly force is no joke and should be a last option unless dire consequences necessitated otherwise. It seems apparent that the police officer firing the killing shot(s) at Marie Zienkewicz was "hoping to get lucky," by firing rounds at a target he "thought" was Cairns. Guessing and hoping to get lucky should not be part of the equation in such a situation and that decision cost an innocent life. When Warminster raises taxes to pay the monetary settlement of the Zienkewicz Family's upcoming civil lawsuit for wrongful death, it might enlighten you about the reality of the situation but based on your other ignorant comments I doubt it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Q

4:35 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

Well said Bob. Glad to see their are rational people here.

Matthew Sayers

8:58 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Bob- Perfectly stated. At the very least, it's comforting to read a comment based in truth, reason, and logic. I, for one, echo your sentiments.

Reply

Bobby Note

2:46 pm on Wednesday, March 27, 2013

The warminster police shot this poor grandmother, hours after the gunmen had last discharged his weapon.In those hours not one of those rocket scientist anonymous claimed they were had sense enough to get blue print of building.also DA (ducks ass ) Heckler who also felt police in perkasie were justafiable in the police murdering a handcuffed mentally challenged man.What a joke he is vote his ass out.Warminster police are a bunch of pu_ _ _y ass thugs who should all be replaced for stealing overtime pay the scandal when Chief James Gorzinski was there.But because they testafied against him DA immunity more training needed this is 2013 how much more training do they need. anony(mouses) spouse was probably one of those of .So you see thats my opinion of warminsters men in blue with yellow streaks up there backs.Lie Lie Lie.Not to mention 21 year old shot and killed over the scums falsely saying he pointed BB gun at them while climbing wooden pickett fence. Do I really need to keep go!ing , Because I can.now there are plenty of Great polce officers out there. But not a single one in WARMINSTER, PA.

Reply

anonymous

5:40 am on Thursday, March 28, 2013

Keep whining little babies....the more you whine the more stupid you sound! Grandmom should have stayed inside like everyone else. She would be alive today! You call the cops thugs.....the kid with the bb gun burglarized homes in the community! Who's the thug here! You pull a gun on a cop your gonna get shot! Period! Oh, I get it, I guess they were supposed to ask him first if it was real or not! Here's a reality check, they don't have to. They have a right to protect themselves! Just like if someone pulled a gun on you! You expect the cops to be sitting ducks! I know one thing, that kid won't pull a gun again on someone, will he! He made his life choices! He wanted to be a criminal! Look where it got him! Oh sure! Blame the cops again! Where's the outcry for Off. Brad Fox and his family! Funny how there was only one comment on that article! Typical! You would never have the balls to do what these cops do! You sound so big and tough on a blog though! I take great pride in have known many brave and outstanding officers in my life! Who have saved many lives! I know this much! You would never make a pimple on any of their as*es! I have talked to many on this topic and they have no problem with the outcome of the DA's investigation. It's only idiots like you who live in a dillusional existence and don't have a clue on what you are whining about! You just think you do! For all I know some of you are criminals anyway. That's why you feel a need to defend them! Get a life!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Schmoe

7:26 am on Thursday, March 28, 2013

It feels good that someone on this site actually has some common sense and understand why it happened. Thank you for being a smart person and actually understanding why it was done.

Comment_arrow

Kirk B

8:00 pm on Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Retards of a feather I guess...

Devon Van Horn

6:59 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

I hope you were being sarcastic, joe. "You pull a gun on a cop your gonna get shot" - to that logic- Marie didn't pull a gun on a cop and yet she still got shot - which is from where my problem stems...Marie had a right to live as much as they had a right to protect themselves. And as I've had to inform you before which you conveniently forgot, Marie was not the only one who left her apartment. And as I said, I too know officers - all of which have been able to apprehend armed suspects without killing bystanders. And because we speak against this specific action of the warminster pd does not mean we are criminals or that we think we are "big and tough" on a blog. You sound like a child - 18 at the oldest. At least I use my name. Also, it was stated following the investigation that the police were confused by the door numbering. Without having full information they fired and an innocent civilian died. That is negligent.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Schmoe

8:15 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

The only reason that I am not using my real name is because I have a very close relative who just happens to be a Warmisnter cop. I would not wan't him to be criticized for my comment. Also, whos job is it to brief the officers on the numbering of the apartments? Is it their job to find the plans and numbers of the buildings themselves? I still believe that the officer was not in the wrong, and that the assailant should be charged with the crime in question.

Devon Van Horn

8:37 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

All of my statements other than the sarcasm one were directed at anonymous. However - whosever job it was to discover the floor plans or what not aside - the officers should have been certain of their target before they fired. Maybe waiting until they were briefed appropriately would have been a good start. That's how you can begin to avoid killing innocent civilians and that is how you avoid being negligent and reckless. It was not Marie's fault that they were unaware of what they were doing. I don't believe the cop should face criminal charges, but I do believe there should be some accountability in his or her lack of control. I am also closely related to a local cop, though not a warminster cop, but since Marie's death was "justified" it just seems that hiding identities would not be needed and that you as well as your relative would stand by the actions and rulings.

Reply

Devon Van Horn

9:46 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

Also - to use a false name is all fine and dandy - but to say we are so tough and bold on a blog was what I was addressing when I said I at least use my name - because I may be just on a blog but I'm not using a false name. It's probably a lot easier to be tough on a blog when you go by something like "anonymous"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Schmoe

10:20 pm on Thursday, March 28, 2013

I understand where you are coming from, but I am just saying that I would say that to anyone face to face. Also, I agree with you that there was obviously an error made somewhere, but who were the officer briefed by? Who was in charge that night? I just get defensive when people on this blog say that the entire department should be fired, or re-trained. The mistake, or error, made by one officer due to false identification should not be blamed on the entire department.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

5:09 am on Friday, March 29, 2013

I'm not stupid enough to put my name out there! Doesn't take much to find out where someone lives nowadays! Wouldn't trust any of you! Lots of crazy cop haters out there! I call that playing it safe and being smart! Which one are you? Stupid or smart! Let me guess!

jrosa

6:36 am on Friday, March 29, 2013

And ur husband is a donut eating pig

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

5:07 am on Saturday, March 30, 2013

My husband is in better shape then most...he would have you on your knees in about 2 seconds!! That's a typical stereotype from an ignorant moron! I wouldn't stoop so low as to use those words! Classless fool, that's all you are! Good luck in life idiot!

Devon Van Horn

10:10 am on Friday, March 29, 2013

"stupid or smart" should be a question not an exclamation. And should I take that as a threat? Just because people aren't supporting the shooting death of an innocent civilian doesn't mean anyone would commit murder themselves. It would actually seem that people are opposed to murder.
Joe - I do not believe they should be fired however I don't see the harm in retraining. It would seem that the w pd is not used to dealing with these types of incidents, which is not a bad thing, but should be addressed. Studies show that when cops fire solo they fire less shots than when they are in groups and the rate of them hitting their subject is a lot lower than missing. That within itself should be addressed in a new training. Any officer who kills a civilian should face a retraining. Jobs in several sectors require further training when something horrific happens and police shouldn't be immune to that standard. They should be held to a higher standard as we are putting our safety in their hands. In pa you cannot handle things yourself - We are required to rely on the police. I don't own any weapons and have no interest in owning any, but I expect those whose jobs issue weapons to be trained and retrained every so often just to be thorough. There is no harm in that. Even teachers face continued education.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Schmoe

11:10 am on Friday, March 29, 2013

I agree with you, but they are re-trained in weapon handling/firing every 6 months, or every year. I believe it is every 6 months. But the entire department should not have to be re-trained or go back to training because 1 cop made a mistake in mis-identification.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

5:02 am on Saturday, March 30, 2013

I was exclaiming more than I was questioning...My remarks were not meant as a threat to you! I was explaining why I would not put my name out there! Knowing what I know, it is potentially dangerous! I have taken a lot of hits from people like you, JRosa and others for having viewed my opinion. Just as you have had the right to yours. I guess I'm not entitled just because my views are different from most of yours. If people are going to be nasty then I will give it right back! My views come from years of experience...I know and understand the laws. Most of you respond to this incident with pure emotion, not from knowledge of the law and how our justice system works! Our country has the best in the world! There's nothing wrong with questioning it but when it has been explained to the public as to the reasons why. You still choose not to accept it! I just don't get it! Go to the Attorney General's office etc. and ask for another investigation. I can guarantee you that the outcome will be the same. The DA's conclusion is the right one! Just because you choose not to accept it does not mean that it's wrong!

Devon Van Horn

11:32 am on Friday, March 29, 2013

Maybe then the entire department should be trained in high stress situations more thoroughly. Stand offs and gun battles aren't an every day occurrence and it is certainly easy to panic during them...which is why every officer should go through training in regards to situations such as this especially in a populated area. This way it won't be another cop next time who kills someone else needlessly. It isn't for punishment, it is for the protection of the people they are there to protect.

Reply
Comment_arrow

anonymous

5:41 am on Saturday, March 30, 2013

Joe is right! The cops are trained every 6 months! They are trained for all kinds of stressful situations. But every situation is totally unigue. You think that it should be black or white! Well it isn't! Any situation that my husband has been in, has been totally different then the one before it! They are highly trained professionals.They watch films, they role play, practice all different kinds of manuevers, using cars, buildings etc. Along with qualifying to shoot a weapon. If you are not very accurate you do not pass and cannot carry a service weapon. When implemented in a real life situation, most of the time it goes as planned! But you are going to have situations that don't. That is called living in the real world! The perfect storm as the DA stated! I know guys in the military and sometimes someone gets killed by friendly fire...it's not that rare! If it's deemed an accident, they don't face criminal charges either! If you lock every one up, even for an accident, that was not negligent, who in their right mind would want to be a cop! Would you! Who would be willing to risk not only there lives but going to jail for attempting to protect you!The laws are there to protect us all! Weather or not you like it...the police have rights and protections afforded to them too! Not just the criminals that they arrest!

John Q

7:42 pm on Friday, March 29, 2013

Township supervisors meeting was supposed to be held last night. Anyone have any news if this debacle was addressed? Was the meeting even held?

Reply

anonymous

12:23 pm on Saturday, March 30, 2013

I am so sick of your comments!!! Alot of good cops have been fired in Warminster over the years!!! Chief Rowan Kelly was fired after only 2 years!!! Because he drank on duty!!! Assaulted citizens!!! Sexually harassed women that worked for him!!!! So what!!! He did his job!!! He was never prosecuted, but he was still fired!!! Chief James Gorczynski!!! You said he stole $130,000 from the department!!! He didn't!!! He borrowed it and was going to pay it all back!!! I know!!! You don't!!! And he was fired!!! John Powell!!! Fired for going to meet a thirteen year old girl he met on the internet!!! Somebody planted condoms!a vibrator!and viagra! in his car!!! He was going to mentor this girl, nothing more!!! I know!!! Chief Elmer Clawges!!! Had sex with 13 and 16 year old girls!!! So what!!! He did his job!!! Never prosecuted!!! At least he kept his job!!! Arrrrgggghhh!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brett Shumaker

3:59 pm on Saturday, March 30, 2013

Anonymous believes that we have the best justice system in the world. Although her views are offensive, pompous, and delusional; I do envy her to a degree. I often wonder what it ls like to live with such a limited mental capacity, life must seem much simpler. Ignorance is bliss.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

3:19 pm on Tuesday, April 2, 2013

This post was done by an anonymous imposter!!!! Just saying!!!

Devon Van Horn

5:01 pm on Saturday, March 30, 2013

Anonymous : you do realize that your spelling alone makes you seem more like the young daughter of a cop than a wife, yes? Also - I wouldn't put my life on the line so I didn't become a cop. A cop, like military personnel, should expect that they may face more dangerous situations than the average civilian. When they get killed in the line of duty there is honor and assistance supplied to the family. What does Marie's family get? Excuses. And as for your last post - I hope one day you re read the horrific things you said "so what" to...apart from the innappropriate relationships or actions the cops you mentioned were a part of with young girls ("so what he still did his job") "borrowing" $130'000 without permission is theft. My company would certainly frown upon it even if i pretended i intended to pay it back and we aren't in the legal or justice system. With your last post you basically proved that you believe the police are above the law.

Reply

jrosa

11:24 pm on Monday, April 1, 2013

wow anon ur last comment is shocking i cant believe ur ok with what u said. now i think im just gonna say. i think ur an asshole plain and simple and i hope ure husband gets fired two peas in a pod . i dont want his protection EVER NEVER EVER

Reply

Leave a comment