Board Approves New Elementary Schedule and Larger Tax Increase
All three elementary schools will start at 8:45 a.m. and dismiss at 3:30 p.m., aided by the purchase of four additional buses. A half-mill tax increase to the 2012-2013 budget will help pay for the vehicle purchases and operation expenses.
Monday's special school board meeting ended with a set schedule for the elementary schools and a slightly larger tax increase for the 2012-2013 budget.
As adopted in the new resolution, Willow Dale, McDonald and Davis Elementary will all begin the school day at 8:45 a.m. and end at 3:30 p.m. The district will purchase four new buses and retain five, adding a total of nine vehicles to the fleet to assist with transporting the elementary students. The directors also mandated that no elementary student spend more than 40 minutes on the bus.
In order to pay for the purchase of the new buses and their operating expenses, including drivers, a mechanic, projected parts for repair and the cost of adding security measures to a parking lot that the district will use to store the surplus vehicles, a .56 mill increase has been added to the Act 1 index raise in the 2012-2013 budget, for a total tax of 116.07 mills, or 2.49 percent. In dollars, the additional increase averages to about $14.78 more for taxpayers, for a grand total average increase of approximately $65. A mill equals a dollar tax on every $1,000 of assessed property value.
The extra half-mill will help fund the ongoing operating costs for the buses. The district will also receive social security reimbursements and transportation subsidies from the state.
The approximate $325,000 one-time cost for the purchase of the vehicles will will come from the district's reserve funds. The move basically moves up the district's vehicle purchase schedule, meaning that the cost will be offset by the fact that no major vehicle purchases will be made next year, according to Centennial Business Administrator Chris Berdnik.
School director Jane Schrader Lynch marveled that the administration was able to come up with a possible solution during a 30 minute recess, something the ad hoc committee was unable to do in two weeks. The reason the ad hoc committee could not reach a similar solution, she said, is because it was held back by a stricter guideline to keep the options budget neutral.
"This is a disgrace," she said. "After all these meetings and spending long hours trying to produce something, we have an impasse tonight and we get a solution in 30 minutes."
With the 5-4 vote, the school board set the parameters for the elementary schedule and gave transportation director Wayne Robinson the summer to figure out a plan. As it stands, with the additional busing for students at Nativity of Our Lord and Our Lady of Good Counsel, Robinson said that some students may take 60 minutes to ride the bus home.
Berdnik stated that it would take about six months to bid out and purchase the buses and that the district can rent buses until the new vehicles are added to the fleet. The district also has to find drivers willing to work part time, since the buses will only be used for the elementary routes.
The compromise seemed agreeable to most of the parents in the audience, who took turns explaining to the school directors that the 3:45 p.m. dismissal time would dramatically alter their home lives. There were a few, however, who disagreed with the proposal, especially since there was no guarantee that some children would not have bus rides of more than 45 minutes.
"It would be irresponsile and shortsighted to spend more money just to save 15 minutes," said Emily Cohen, who participated in the ad hoc committee. "I am in full support of the staggered schedule. I do have children that would be impacted by it, and I think everyone can adjust."
Director David Shafter said the guarantee comes from the school board's resolution that no child spend more than 40 minutes on the bus. It's up to the transportation department to find a way to make it work, he said.
Tired of Hypocrisy
8:49 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
No surprise to anyone that has been paying attention to the CSB & Administrators. Thank you to those Board members who voted against the latest proposal, at the very least you have shown the community that you do not want to make rash decisions like the others. Shame on those that voted for this, it is the scenario when you voted to demolish & consolidate the elementary schools. No thought about the future and still isn't. I was actually embarrassed listening to Mr. Robinson, he was ill-prepared for the meeting proving once again, he is in over his head and the students suffer because of it. If you are going to raise taxes then please put some towards searching for someone to replace Mr. Robinson, he has desicrated the bus schedules and bus stops. He only knows how to push computer buttons & has no common sense.
Cannot wait to see how you will cover all the stops within 40 minutes of the school day ending. Of course, would not be surprising if you had the children wait in the school for an hour, do triple runs & then get them all home within the alloted 40 minutes on the bus. In fact, I'd place bets on that as well as when I placed bets taxes would be raised to solve the latest example of ineptness by Administration & some on the Board.
There is a positive to the final agreement, ALL elementary schools begin and end at the same time. Fair to all students and parents. Thank you for giving at least that.
Leann G. Russell
5:17 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I would like to take this time to remind everyone that when the decision to reduce schools from six to three the administration was informed by Mr. Robinson that we would need to purchase more buses and that we would need to replace some of the older buses that are smaller with larger buses. I remember this meeting as if it was yesterday, even though it was over three years ago. We were told that we would save money from this reduction since we would be closing school and reducing our operational cost of these schools. Well, Davis closed two years ago, and Leary closed one year ago and now Longstreth has closed. Where is the savings? What happened to it? New Bus Drivers would be paid out of Operational money. The board has also been offered over 400,000 for each of the four school buildings that are closed. What will happen to that money? Why not use it to purchase the buses needed. Since the start of all of this, we the public have been given false information. Three years ago, the board was told that we needed the buses and as usual they did nothing about it. There is a chance that we may not have the new buses that we need in time for the start of the new school year. This board has always been behind the eight ball when it comes to planning- always changing but never planning for anything. Get it together! Order the buses now! Your procrastination is going to put this district is a terrible position come September.
Thomas Hezel
8:53 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
If you don't care for how the school board handles things, you're always free to run yourself. They are always looking for qualified people who think they can do a better job. Just sayin...
Tired of Hypocrisy
8:51 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
And as an aside, noticed that the woman who supported the idiotic staggered schedule was the only person permitted to go over the allotted two minutes. Dr. Pollock of course is not biased, it was an oversight on his part, he did not hear the bell ring.
Daniella
8:59 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I know...I noticed how she was the only one allowed to go over as well!!! Nope, no bias there. Well - not the best solution, but at least its more equitable across the 3 elementary schools, without the burden just being placed on Davis/Willow Dale.
Emily Cohen
9:05 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
As I am sure you are referring to me, I feel the need to state something. This was the first time I have ever attended, as well as spoken at, a board meeting. Therefore, I was unaware that the bell indicated the 2-minute deadline. I had my eyes on Dr. Pollock for a signal that my time was up. As soon as he raised the gavel, I stopped. How quickly we forget that at the meeting in May, Mrs. Lynch allowed Michelle Hazlett to speak well beyond the deadline of 2 minutes.
Michelle Hazlett
11:32 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
OK Emily, This was the first meeting you ever attended and spoke at. I have been to many board meetings and also spoke up at many. Not just in regards to this specific problem. The first meeting I attended I spoke up about the ethics of a certain principle and superintendent I was told my two minutes were up and given a lecture by Dr.Pollock. But guess what, that principle and superintendent are no longer here. I spoke up when a principle was forced to resign because of actions by a board member and a superintendent. And yes, I have spoken up about the current situation. Dr. Pollock is VERY familiar with me and if he hates me I really don't care. You talk about the May meeting which I was able to speak longer. Well if you recall that meeting there were many more parents that were aloud to speak longer than 2min and it was a decision made by the board not just Mrs. Lynch!!
Emily Cohen
10:06 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Lauren, you are most welcome. I strive to always speak and comment with logic, without resorting to personal attacks. I did feel it necessary to point out the inconsistency in Mr. Miller's stated viewpoint about length of bus ride, and his later willingness to propose a scenario that, to date, has shown us bus rides approaching as much as 60 minutes.
Nia, I agree with you on so many points. The behavior of some board members is atrocious. It wasn't just at this board meeting; it is a pattern of behavior that I have seen every time I have watched the meetings on tv. Nobody is thinking about the extended bus times. Bus stops will likely need to be consolidated, again; however, we saw at the beginning of the 2011-2012 school year that many consolidated bus stops were changed back to the original ones after parents complained. What will happen in the fall? Will Mr. Miller fight against consolidated bus stops again, which will further increase the bus rides for the students? This is why I stated that people are thinking in a short-sighted manner.
Pamela
10:10 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Give me a break Dr. Pollock watches that clock as if everyone was a thief! Bang "Your 2 mins is up". He doesn't let anyone goe over. He only let people talk over 2 mins at the last meeting because the Board voted to. Mr. Miller stated last night that Dr. Pollock and himself have been trying to increase the school day for years. Watch those 2, especially with that repeated amendment trick after 2 defeats. How can our new Board claim to be more responsible, when they pass a motion without any kind of paper work from Transportation, they only rquired a promise from transportation that no child be on a bus longer than 40 mins. Does everyone remember this year when you called transportation to complain about overcrowding and late buses. "This is the first we are hearing this" "take a picture of the overcrowding on the bus, so we can see it", "It's a new driver, they don't know the route". Yeah I can see it now, come September those Board members that voted for this will say "We don't know what your talking. We haven't heard any issues w transportation" .
Pamela
10:13 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
To Mr. Hartline, Mrs. Huf, Mrs. Lynch, and Mrs. Driban, THANK YOU for having the common sense to refuse to approve anything without printed numbers in front of you! The Board could have approved the tax increase to cover the cost of buses and held off on the bus schedule until Transportation provided number, But this will be another example of could have, should have, would have. The only good thing from this is that all schools end at the same time.
Thomas Hezel
8:56 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
You DO realize that many times board members pre-count the yes's and no's and vote the way that can convenience them; ie, voting no even though they know in advance the measure will pass. Correct?? Not saying this happened here, but it does happen often. Especially with budget votes.
Michelle Hazlett
11:46 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Lets be honest. NOBODY won last night!! The taxpayers lost, the students lost and the board lost. There were no winners!! Come September it will still be one big mess just like it is now..Nia, you talk about people for being ignorant when making personal attacks....Did you read your comment about Mrs. Lynch in one of your previous comments? I don't understand why you are attacking us parents that oppose the time? We did not want the extra 15min most of us wanted the half hour. We would not be complaining at all if the situation had been addressed and resolved in the last three years and not in the last three months.
Pamela
1:52 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
she didn't live her last year, so she has no idea what the board has done in the past years to completely alientate the community. Mrs. Lynch and Mrs. Huf have been the only 2 original members that have fought consistently against these ill conceived plans. They have fought for the children and the community, only to see us lose every single time. Yes they get nasty sometimes, but you can only bang your head against a wall so many time before you become frustrated. They saw this coming, the community saw this coming, we asked questions and were told it was taken care off. The other members turned a blind eye to any potential problem.. All they wanted was a "legacy" to be remembered by,so they destroyed the neighborhood schools that were blue ribbon as a direct result of their teachers. Now we have hugh beautiful schools, wonderful teachers who are being cut, and a declining moral among students as they see their favorites teachers leaving. We voted to get rid of these fools, (some jumped ship), and had such high hopes for their replacements. Now we are realizing that this board may not be any better than the last, as our children and the community is still losing.
Michelle Hazlett
5:23 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Nia, what school does your child go to? Does your child goes to McDonald and the reason why you are upset is because now they will have the same school time as everyone else? I stated before that NOBODY won in last nights decision so stop blaming all this mess on the parents. You just moved here. You have no idea what the students and parents have been through in the last 3 years. Give it a few years and maybe you will understand. We all live here too which means all of our taxes will go up. We are all paying the price because the board did not do their job properly. If you have a problem with the situation than I suggest you go to the next board meeting, fill out the green card and voice your concerns to the board in person. But please, STOP blaming the parents for what transpired last night!!!
concerned123
2:19 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Residents of Centennial have no one to blame but ourselves.
The recent unfunded teachers contract that was approved should have been a red flag to the residents. We have board members that our financial irresponsible. They show no respect to the Taxpayers whom they we elected to represent.
Until there is a major board change things will not change, Everyear we will see tax increases. Wait till the PSER (PENSION) contribution comes down the pike.......we will all be shocked by that tax bill ! And just remember all these raises the teachers get with steps will just increase the amount of tax due each resident will have to pay towards their pensions .
So if residents do not speak up , nor attend meetings and demand a finacially responsible board expect the same news
Sarah Ronzelli
2:51 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I was at the school board meeting last night and I have never seen such a disgraceful show in my life. They had to at one point not pass a budget, to get the administration to get the job done. Mr. Miller kept putting motion after motion to the board, if he did not like the result he made another motion. Does he care about taxes the answer is NO! Does he care about children riding on buses for a long period of time, NO. What does he care about, how about getting his own way. Miller and Polluck play games with the children and their parents. Do they both care about taxes NO. Do they care about about budgets NO. If Polluck doesn't like what you say, you have a time limit. If he likes what you have to say you can speak longer. Miller and Polluck like the power but don't know how to use it. Polluck is a retired teacher and he gets his large pension so what does he care? Miller just seeks glory for himself and he doesn't care! These two are on our school board, what a disgrace....
Warminster Resident
5:11 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Where exactly did people think they were going to get the money to purchase new buses, since our precious children couldn't be in school until 3:45? Did you really think you could say "no staggered start" and "no raising taxes" AND "buy new buses" and that those things would just - POOF! - happen? so let's see...now, instead of leaving school at 3:45, students leave 15 minutes earlier and spend twice as long on their buses. I'm pretty sure the net gain there is basically nil - they'll still be getting home at the same time, if not later now. The meeting last evening was extremely embarrassing; that grown adults can behave like that - esoecially knowing they are being videoed - is unfortunate and sad. It's ashame that so many people have their own agendas that interfere with what is best for the community and the children. But listening to the vitriol spewed at the board when they even considered a 3:45 end time, I'm not surprised they went the way they did; not at all.
concerned123
6:26 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Why do you think audence members yell out? The board has done nothing but created a level of frustration and confusion thru their actions and policies in recent years..
Parents,residents and taxpayers are totally ignored,Our words go on deaf ears.
Residents in Centennial need to wake up and push for a more transparent and fiscally responsible board. Current members need to go !
Warminster Parent
7:23 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Dear Nia and Emily did you see the survey results? Your opinion doesn't represent the majority.
Jane Lynch was awesome. She has more common sense then the rest of them combined. She represents the voice of most of the parents. The rest of the board members have been down right belligerent to the public for a long time. Its time they got put in their place!!! I was cheering for Jane while watching on my pc. She will be the only one to get my vote again!!!
Daniella
8:00 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Mrs. Lynch expressed all the frustration that the majority of us feel with this Board and I thank her for it. It felt like someone was actually speaking up for us. Unfortunately, the result isn't really a win for anyone, but why blame the parents? We are not the ones who chose to consolidate schools but didn't adequately think and plan it through. We are not the ones who weren't fiscally responsible. One statement from the meeting last night stuck for me and that was when the issue was approached about how nowhere in the discussions of the consolidation of the schools was it said that transportation issue that would result from this consolidation would have to be revenue neutral! I wouldn't expect it to be! You're going from 6 schools to 3. You're greatly increasing your bus riders. As a matter of common sense, I would have expected that more buses would be purchased for that purpose and that this would have been an obvious and necessary part of any budget. That they were trying to put this inadequate and, very likely, ineffective band aid of "staggered busing" on it was just prolonging the inevitable.
Emily Cohen
11:36 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Warminster Parent: I did see the survey results. I was on the Ad-Hoc Committee and pointed out, just as a board member did at the meeting, that this was not a scientific, methodical survey. I could survey 100 people and get completely different results. Would that mean that the vote should be different? Unfortunately, sometimes the majority (as in the survey results) should not prevail. The decision that was made was not based in logic; it was based in emotion and done with a goal of appeasing some parents, in my opinion. Jane Lynch's behavior as a board member is despicable. She does not follow procedure, she ignores the rules, she grandstands, and does a fine acting job. I would be more inclined to listen if she just spoke, stated things with reason, and ceased the yelling and drama. The majority of the board is actually respectful toward the community. I say this with direct experience, as I have called and e-mailed every single board member repeatedly with respect to these recent issues. The same can be said for every member of the administration with whom I have spoken. That includes Jenny Cressman, Bill Gretton, Wayne Robinson, and Susan Klyman. If the residents of this district take the time to speak with the people striving to accomplish things, they will explain things and answer every single question you have. Give them the opportunity. They really are trying to put the students' needs first, but some board members "tied their hands" with the votes at the meeting.
Warminster Parent
8:20 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Dear Daniella, you are correct. Do you remember the first original plan was to go to one mega-school. Imagine that. Staggered start times wouldnt have even been an option and 95 percent of the district would have to be bused.
Daniella
9:23 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I do remember the mega school idea. Now that would have been truly frightening had that gone through!
Sarah Ronzelli
8:10 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Emily, You of all people are attacking Mrs. Lynch when your behavior at the Ad Hoc meetings was demanding and self imposing. At the second meeting of the committee you wanted your own way and argued with the committee about what they could do and what you thought they couldn’t do. You told the committee the school board had made a motion and that the committee had no authority to look into options. You totally mobilized the meeting demanding an explanation to what they were doing. At the third meeting you started fighting again and at the end of the meeting you decided to attack Mr. Miller because he treated you with disrespect and went on and on about him. You attack Mrs. Lynch for trying to get a reasonable solution. Your blogs on the Ad Hoc committee are ridicules and arrogant, it’s your way only. Your contribution to this committee was zero and you just wasted everyone’s time for your personal agenda. Many dedicated people were on this committee who wanted to find a solution and were kind enough to tell people who were not on the committee how you acted as a member of the committee. You never wanted a solution, you were in favor to the staggering bell schedule because it did not affect you at all, and you just wasted people’s time because you did not get your way. Stop leveling comments about other people when you were the one and the only one who tried to ruin this committee
Daniella
9:12 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I thought the Ad Hoc committee was formed to seek out alternatives to the staggered schedule proposal. Why would someone who very clearly supported the original proposal and, essentially, was against the entire purpose of the committee, be on the committee in the first place??
concerned citizen
4:44 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Daniella, because she wrote a letter to Dr. Pollack stating how much she was for the staggered bell schedule, how the board was doing a wonderful job and how wrong all the parents were for whining. Dr. Pollack formed this committee knowing it would never have a chance and he made sure to add wonderful Emily to it. She has no clue what's going on in this district. I love her comments about "how parents complained about the bus consolidation so Mr. Miller just made the bus consolidation disappear!" Well, I don't know if her kids take the bus, but mine and alot more do and our bus stops were consolidated. Mr. Robinson said oh well, deal with it when some parents complained that it was to far for a small child to walk. Especially uphill during the winter. Notice how she hasn't responded since someone put her in her place. I love her comment about how she tries to comment: (I copied & pasted this from her ealier comment) "I strive to always speak and comment with logic, without resorting to personal attacks." After this comment, she proceded to bash Mr. Miller, then some board members, the parents, and then Mr. Miller, again. She's always bashing someone on here. Hopefully she goes away.
Daniella
5:07 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Wow- it gets worse and worse the more you find out. I always thought the committee was doomed for failure but I didn't know that it was being undermined from within, right from the beginning! And yes, my bus stop was also consolidated and nobody cared, so I dont know what that comment meant either.
michelle
8:49 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Being new to the area and district from Richboro, I applaud Mrs.Lynch for her dfirect personality with other board members and calling it as she sees it. Moving from CR, everyone is so diplomatic and polite.. seemingly so false. Finally, a meeting where someone speaks out , tells someone else to shut their mouth as she speaks. She's great.
Warminster Dad
9:10 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Unfortunately, our board catered to the squeaky wheel. Many parents are able to make a bad situation work as well as possible. remember, WE CUT EDUCATORS AND HIRED BUS DRIVERS. That is educationally sound. I guarantee you that if my child is on a second run, or gets home later than he should, I will be louder than the few parents who spoke out against the proposed change. Also, the parents who spoke out...How many of you are PARENT PICK UP? Your kids won't even have to ride the bus. You can feel a sense of victory if you want, but Mrs. Lynch and all her theatrics have no place in an intelligent conversation about how to make a budget work. Let's just throw more money at any problem.
I'm sure some of the board (only some) who are incompetent, have reassured their re-election based on their irresponsible voting. I just hope programs don't get cut even further.
To those board members who tried to be responsible to a budget and the fiscal crisis that we are trying to dig out of, THANK YOU.
Warminster Dad
10:58 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Remember the board only stated a 40 minute bus ride, THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE TIME SPENT WAITING FOR THE BUS TO PICK THEM UP. It only counts from when the bus leaves the school. We could still have children waiting for the bus for up to 40 minutes like at Willow Dale this year. The staggered bell time was supposed to eliminate that.
dr.qsmart@gmail.com
11:05 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Warminster Dad, tell me where the savings from the consoldation of 6 schools to 3 schools is?? Tell me where the savings from laying off teachers is?? Tell me where the new teachers' contract saving is? Since you claim to know about budgets, please let us know, we will be listening! Do you know Huf, Hartline, Lynch, Driban voted against increasing your taxes and keeping children on buses for extending periods of time.
Warminster Dad
1:40 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I did not want consolidation, but we got it. Less teachers=savings, Less custodial=savings, less maintenance=savings, Less administration=savings. Now we try to save to not cost taxpayers more, but the parents who think equal means start time the same for all, have no clue about fairness. Waiting for 30 minutes to get on the bus for another 40 is no good. but hey we all start at the same time. Some parents could have actually saved money with the staggered start because they wouldn't have to pay after care, (I don't, but I think of the district as a whole.)
How many times during the meeting did the board claim to Help the Willow Dale Parents, What about the other 5 schools. IT IS DONE, IT IS OVER, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED. Now we just have to pay more taxes because a few (>10%) complained. Other people just tried to make it work because they understand that when you only have this much money, you spend that much more or else more things have to go. I feel sorry for Dr. Cressman.
Remember how much you are paying for buses when good teachers don't have a job. They are kept by seniority, not ability.
Warminster Dad
1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
**Can't spend that much more.**
Sorry
V T S
12:56 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Let me start by saying this is my opinion and impression. I’m not saying anyone is wrong or that I am right. I’m simply sharing.
I’ve been following this school district for most of this past school year – fairly closely at times, other times not so much, but mostly when it benefited me the most. My son started kindergarten this year at McDonald-Davis. He will be at Nativity next year. Now that the school year is over, I feel compelled to share my thoughts.
Growing up in Northeast Philadelphia, I went to catholic school mainly to escape public school. I used to hear how great public schools in the suburbs were and my parents only wished they could afford to make that sort of move. Needless to say, while this particular suburban public school (CSD) doesn’t have nearly the level of problems Philadelphia has, I was hardly overwhelmed in any positive way.
There are so many things inherently wrong with public schools in general. They are, in fact, an extension of government, and therefore an extension of politics. When was the last time you trusted politics to deliver? They may say what you want to hear, but the “precious education of our youth” is nothing more than the same carrot politicians use when they talk about “our American Dream.”
<continued>
V T S
12:58 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Problem #3: The board. What is their motivation, really? I think some actually believe in educating children, but most are having fun playing with CSD Taxpayer Money. Ever do the math? Tax dollar revenue divided by student headcount should give you effective rate of tuition per child. Want to know that per annum dollar amount? If you just look at total real estate tax revenue (57.5 million / 6,200 students), the tuition would be $9,290 per student. If you look at all local revenue (63.5 million / 6,200 students), the tuition would be $10,245 per student. These examples ignore the revenue brought in by the state and federal sources which is an additional $2,865 per student. The beauty of the system is none of us pay that much. The utter failure of the system is none of us are getting an education equal to what those dollars would provide in the private sector. How is it we don’t see a better product? In my opinion, it’s the lack of accountability. Private schools can go out of business. Public schools cannot.
V T S
12:59 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Problem #2: A principle who would rather get through the year and see a bad teacher off to Davis next year (sorry Davis) then deal with what it would take to get her to change her ways or remove her. A principle who said what needed to be said at the time, but never intended to follow up or follow through. A principle who runs a school where the children are not taught to respect one another or property. Perhaps this comes from my catholic school up-bringing, but I actually think, regardless of faith, respect of others and property is decent common moral value for all to share. Principle did not care about her school a way a principle should and the children reflect that sentiment.
<continued>
V T S
12:59 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Problem #1: My son had a teacher, fully tenured, making a 6 figure salary and bounces from school-to-school, grade-to-grade because she is a horrible teacher who cannot be fired. I’d love to be working full time at 45 years of age, making 6 figures and guaranteed my job until I do retire with my sweet pension waiting for me all while not having to care or try to be a good teacher. I could write an entire novella of what is wrong with this teacher. I’m all for unions. They have a place, but without checks and balances, they abuse their power as much as the next guy. The teacher unions are doing to public schools what unions did to the US automobile industry.
<continued>
Thomas Hezel
2:56 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
You won't regret sending your son to Nativity. Blue Ribbon school of excellence. Excellent staff. Family atmosphere. Dedication pouring out at every turn. The students reflect this. They're all amazing. Parent's make a big difference. AND you'll be saving all those taxpayers money. Welcome to the Nativity family!
Warminster Family
7:34 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Dear Lauren, even though having the committee made up of all opinions across the board may seem fair, its not when the adhoc committee is disproportionately represented. Another words, Emily had to much say for someone representing the minority opinion.
Dear VTS, just like any workplace in this world 10% percent of the people cause 90% of the problems. So there may be some less than stellar teachers out there, but 90% of the ones I have met are exceptional. In case you have been living in cave there has been plenty of negative news about the Catholic Schools (priests) out there.
Dear Warminster Dad, They were cutting the teachers anyway with the consolidation. It’s not like we traded teachers for drivers. People were upset about the late start times. We couldn’t get the teachers back, but who wants to add insult to injury with the late start times. Our taxes are still cheaper than most. Maybe if the Anne's Choice Residents would "Annie Up" and pay it would even be cheaper.
I also watched the meeting on TV. I applaud Jane Lynch for standing up to the rest of them. Jane Rocks!!!
Tax payer
11:26 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Ann's Choice is a retirement community and by definition they are not obligated by Tax Code to pay school tax. They do however, ALOT of fundraising for CSD---So be careful with what you say---you could cause more revenue loss to the school district.
Parents need to STEP UP and run for a spot on the School Board if you truely feel that your ideas are the best for EVERY tax payer in this school district. Then you will see exactly how difficult it is to deal with the parents that want what they want and when they want it without consideration for anyone elses (the community) needs. You can deal with the "monday mornning quarter backing" - having someone else second quess you every decision.
Instead of ranting about not getting your way, how about you teach your children to adapt to changes that have been made. Let your children know that they are not always going to get their way when it comes to the real world. Life is tough and instead of teaching coping skills to your kids you are teaching them to be disrepectful to anyone who thinks differently then them.
Parents--- GROW UP, no one won in this district. Compromises happen all the time -DEAL with it.
LMJ
11:39 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Thank you Tax Payer! That is what I have been saying all along. Prepare to be attacked...
LMJ
10:21 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Daniella- who is to say that the 9-345 wasn't the best solution for the community as a whole? Just because it works for a select few does not mean that the majority benefits. I understand you all take the survey results as a true testament to how the majority feels but unfortunately that study didn't capture the general population.
Daniella
10:39 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Whether 9-3:45 was ultimately the best solution or not is irrelevant to the guidelines that were set for the Ad Hoc Committee. And as for the survey not reflecting what the general population wanted, thats pure conjecture. The survey might not be scientific but at my regular job, I work with surveys and while response rates are relevant, we work with the results we get, we dont try to extrapolate as to what the non-respondents might be thinking. Of course, at this point, its all a moot point. We're stuck with the solution we're stuck with, one that really wasn't a win for anyone.
concerned citizen
5:07 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
The 9-3:45 only worked for the McDonald students & the walkers (minority) of the other 2 schools. NOT the bus riders of Davis & Willowdale. The general population who don't have a child in school, didn't vote because they could care less what time our children get out. So get off it.
concerned citizen
8:48 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
No, Lauren, you get real. It is costing the "general population" $14.86 for a total of four new buses. I didn't see the "general population" going crazy over the 100's of dollars our taxes have been raised these last 4 years. Just for $14.86! Don't get me wrong, I do not want my taxes to keep going up, but the buses should have been in the budget the last four years. Maybe if this board have done their job these last couple of years, then we wouldn't be in this mess. All I keep seeing is how this board is building all these new schools under budget, well where's the extra money going? It sure isn't going back into the general fund or operations. If it was, we wouldn't have to keep having our taxes raised. They are frivolously spending it on the extras. Here's an expert from another patch article about Davis being under budget if you don't want to take my word.
" Davis Elementary School Update
Miller told the board construction at Davis Elementary School is "under budget and on time." He said the district would like to start moving items into the building July 15."
The board also said that about the highschool. Where's the savings for the taxpayer?
StopTheInsanity
6:35 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Does anyone find it ironic that the three loudest protestors of the staggered school times (Lynch, Huf, Miller) are all on the Education Committee that approved the staggered start times by a vote of 3-0 back in April? The only concern at that time was getting the schedules out early to allow parents time to adjust, not the actual school times. How do you go from unanimous approval to the theatrics we witnessed Monday evening from these three members? Another interesting point about Monday's circus - Mr. Miller was clearly incensed that Administration did not use some consultant to optimize the bus routes, he made a point of saying that Dr. Cressman authorized a consultant to come in for one day and optimize the routes, but that the consultant was not brought in and that is why the committee failed. But if you check the district website, Mr. Miller clearly states on June 6th that "1) We have acquired, and are installing new software today, that will allow us to optimize our bus routes in house more quickly and for considerably less money than we would pay on the outside. This also permits greater control on variables. This resolves one of the early problems we encountered in collecting data and extrapolating results." So, how can you complain at the Board meeting that a consultant was not used when less than 2 weeks earlier, you were boasting that you are able to optimize the bus routes with the new software and save the district money? It makes no sense at all!!
concerned123
8:28 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Lynch flip flops all the time. She was in support of a new unfunded teachers contract when the business mananger stood up and stated projected debt figures. And now she votes agaisnst tax increases to make herself look good. She is Clueless like most of the other board members.
They have all forgotten their orth of financial responsiblity they took when they were elected. Unless there is a major change, this disctrict will become the new Neshaminy
Ante Up
7:16 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Dear Taxpayer, Retirement Communities are not immune from property taxes. However Ann's Choice did have some sort of agreement with a ten year abatement. I guess it was for buiding on a former Superfund Hazardas waste site. I copied and pasted the following from an article regarding Ann's Choice:
Real Estate Tax – Ann’s Choice has been operating under a
Payment in Lieu of Tax agreement since its inception. This
agreement has expired. After a period of negotiation with
the taxing authorities it was deemed necessary for Ann’s
Choice to file suit in order to pursue what we believe would
be a more equitable arrangement for the community given
the economic climate and decline in real estate values. We
hope to settle this suit during 2012.
Michelle Hazlett
12:38 am on Friday, June 22, 2012
For those McDonald parents who lost the prime time of 8:30am to 3:15pm I am sorry for you. Let me ask you, how would you feel if it were reversed and Willow Dale/Davis got the earlier time and you had the later time? I bet you all would be up in arms just like us. I did not see any McDonald parents saying "We will take the 9-3:45 time" There should be no staggered times. All elementary schools should be out at the same time. If your child plays sports/dance how would you feel if there were 3 equal teams in the finals but because the umpires/judges did not show up they just decided to pick winners. Your child's team lost and another team won. It was not your childs fault that the umpire/judge did not show up so why does the other team get to win? Don't tell me that you as a parent would not be upset! Don't tell me that you would tell your child to DEAL WITH IT! There were NO WINNERS in the vote! We all lost! Nobody is gloating and cheering on here saying"WE WON"!! The board had 3 years to figure this out. They knew that more buses were needed. They tried to pull a fast one and got caught. As far as teacher cuts go, they were cutting positions before the board meeting on Monday. Positions are not being cut because we need buses. All the schools in the area are cutting back on the fine arts programs, not just Centennial. If you have an issue with the solution that go to the board. Take it out on them, not us!!
Warminster Dad
8:09 am on Friday, June 22, 2012
Just so you know there were McDonald parents who would rather have had the 9:00 - 3:45 time and also parents who said whatever we get we will deal with, even if McDonald is the 9:00 - 3:45. Please stop making this an issue of school against school and acting like every McDonald parent loved the 8:30 - 3:15.
Emily Cohen
9:05 am on Friday, June 22, 2012
There have been staggered times in this district until now. That doesn't mean that students/parents in different schools were treated unfairly. We are one district; I agree with Warminster Dad: there shouldn't be an "us against them" mentality. The issue is over, whether you agreed with it or not. Now we just have to hope that the bus schedules will work smoothly as the board intended.
longstreth neighbor
9:54 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012
teachers get raises and guaranteed jobs, tenuring a teacher sometimes just keeps the bad ones waiting to retire . while the good teachers are laid off, why not like most people that work and inflation hits have teachers pay more for health benefits that would save the tax payers and possible save a teachers job or two have them pay more for retirement. the staggered bus schedule seemed to work you just have to work around the changes. what happen to money from the sale of the 3 schools?. and did they forget when they put new homes in a already saturated market in where the schools were, i am sure more children will need the bus. not sure about retirement homes what they pay in taxes. as more taxes being added more resident wanting reassessment due to the decline in property values to lower their taxes more loss tax income. i would like to see the school board voted out and ones that are more concerned about the residents of Warminster an CSD. i moved to warminster because of the lower taxes. but they are starting to get up there with other township might be timed to move. i vote with my feet why not because nobody listens to the taxpayers anyway
James
11:24 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I wish they left well enough alone and took care of the elementary buildings they already had. Each building has character and a sense of its community. Elementary school kids are young it was nice to be educated in the very beginning with a smaller school they had a sense of security. I know the bus commutes are going to be awful my daughter says she gets sick on them as it is. This block schedule idea for elementary is terrible. I feel sick to my stomach about these changes I am going to have very miserable children who are not going to want to go to school on a daily basis, they are going to miss their home their previous school where they were relaxed, nurtured and truly felt a sense of belonging. The school board I'm sure no longer have small children that this affects them. I do nota want to put a scared kindergartner on a bus and ship her across town for 40 minutes alone. Has the school even thought about how many parents are going to attempt to drive and pick up the children due to such delays in time.