Pennsylvania Reacts Live to the Romney-Obama Debate

Local readers discuss Oct. 3 debate in Bucks and Montgomery.

When Wendy Larson arrived to watch Wednesday night's presidential debate at Ann's Choice in Warminster, she had already decided on voting for incumbent President Barack Obama.

"I made up my mind after the conventions," said Larson. "When I saw the Republicans, I didn't think they represented me."

Ninety minutes later, Larson found herself back on the fence over how she will cast her ballot on Nov. 6.

"Romney acquitted himself well," she said. "He showed he has more experience in dealing with the country's problems."

Judging by the real time reactions posted by Patch users in Bucks and Montgomery counties during last night's liveblog of the debate, the general consensus is that Romney won the first of three scheduled debates between the candidates.

"Mitt won, hands down," commented user Joe Moon. "Obama was clearly out of his league. But that is the difference between a community organizer, and a real man from the real world."

The local and national trend is that Wednesday was Romney's night, which is undoubtedly good news for a campaign that struggled in September.

"I loved his aggressiveness, he stood up for himself, I was delighted with his performance tonight and it shows the public what kind of leader he can be," said Pat Poprik, chair of the Bucks County Republican Committee. “I think the strongest point [Romney] made tonight was how he wants to attack the deficit and the economy. His plan is real and valid. You have to stop spending, just like a household budget. Undoubtedly, Romney won tonight. There is no doubt in my mind he won tonight.”

As of midnight, Patch readers clearly declared Republican candidate Mitt Romney as the winner in a post-debate poll, giving him 69 percent of the vote.

"It’s night and day and the reality is out here in the public," said Ray Babcock as he stood outside the Bucks County Republican Committee headquarters in Doylestown. "This President is leading us down the wrong path. I liked Romney’s statements on the economy, taxes, the whole bit. I think Romney really handled the debate well and he is coming from the heart, he’s passionate, and you can hear that he is American. I think Obama’s intentions are good, but he is off a little bit in his understanding."

President Obama was not without his own supporters, however.

“I have been pleased with the caliber of the debate," said Kevin Green, a volunteer at the Bucks County Democratic Field Office in Doylestown. "I think there are some good points being made by both sides and both sides are representing their views, but I think Obama’s message is coming across very clear. He supports a different vision in dealing with the economy and moving America forward."

The face-off was the first debate between the two candidates and took place at the University of Colorado. Moderated by PBS anchor Jim Lehrer, the topics focused on domestic policy issues, including jobs, the economy, entitlements and the overall function of government in American society.

"Mitt definitely won tonight," said Patch reader and frequent blogger Mike Shortall. "President looked tired and harried. Mitt spoke much better, and clearly laid out his framework for the country, especially economically. Much better performance than I expected."

Despite the 90 minutes of back and forth and clear philosophical distinctions, the major takeaway from the debate occurred early on during an exchange over federal spending. Romney stated that part of his plans include cutting Obamacare and funding for public broadcasting.

"I'm sorry, Jim, I'm going to stop the subsidy to PBS," Romney said to debate moderator Jim Lehrer. "I'm going to stop other things. I like PBS, I love Big Bird. Actually I like you, too. But I'm not going to -- I'm not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for [it]."

The line was quickly jumped on by social media users and by the end of the debate, the #bigbird hashtag was trending on Twitter and a fake Big Bird account had been created.

"Romney plans to fire Big Bird!!! WTF!! That's his plan????" commented Joann Cosgrove.

The other common takeaway from last night's debate is that Lehrer did not perform well as moderator. His efforts to cut the candidate's off because they ran over their allotted time or he wished to change subjects were repeatedy ignored.

"Lehrer clearly can not control the candidates," said user Scott Johnson.

Next on the schedule is the vice presidential debate on Oct. 11 at 9 p.m. between incumbent Joe Biden and Republican candidate Paul Ryan. They will meet at Centre College in Kentucky, with ABC's Martha Raddatz presiding.

Obama and Romney will meet again on Oct. 16 at 9 p.m. at Hofstra University in Hempstead, N.Y., for a town hall-style debate, with CNN's Candy Crowley as moderator, followed by the final debate on foreign policy on Oct. 22 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Fla., moderated by CBS' Bob Scheiffer.

The Illuminati October 04, 2012 at 04:03 PM
I wonder if Obamacare covers butt kickings? Seriously though, I'm not sure why Obama can't understand how Romney can keep take cuts for all Americans without increasing the deficit. Its alarmingly simple, Mr President...if more people are working, then there are more tax payers in the system! Right now with so many out of work or under employed, the country is not generating near enough tax revenue to sustain itself, let alone pay for massive spending programs like Obamacare. Simple solution: Get everyone back to work by reducing tax burdens on small businesses so they hire, cut wasteful spending programs (Obamacare, etc) and reduce the size of the federal government by eliminating redundant agencies and combining tasks and reducing the federal workforce...through attrition, not layoffs. Mr Romney nailed it on the head.
The Illuminati October 04, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Sorry...tax cuts...not "take" cuts.
Sidney Ruff October 04, 2012 at 07:22 PM
That's all well and good more people back to work, but how about the "rich" paying their fair share of taxes? Plus if Obamacare goes, my husband who has Stage 4 lung cancer cant get coverage because of pre-existing condition and Romney lied about covering people with pre-existing. Read 99 facts about Mitt Romney, because all he does is lie and Ryan does too and they have no respect for women.
Maria October 04, 2012 at 07:30 PM
Sidney-- everything you just wrote is a lie. Romney 2012. He believe in America and knows how to run businesses and get people back to work. Obama -- four years of failure, apologizing and lies.
Bonnie Freeman October 04, 2012 at 10:40 PM
John McThief the Third you're an insensitive complete idiot! Go die!
Sidney Ruff October 05, 2012 at 12:27 AM
Who the hell do you think you are I made comments about Romney and Ryan and not you, so what gives you the right to attack me. Last time I checked it was a free country where everyone is entitled to their own opinion, that being said you have no right to attack me or my husband you don't know our circumstances, we had insurance they put a cap on the amount of coverage when we tried to get different insurance he has a pre existing condition, we have worked and paid taxes our whole lives, my husband is retired and is 67 yrs old and we're having problems so find some empathy and quit being a jerk, not that is my opinion of you do not attack without all the facts!!!!!!!
David Michael October 05, 2012 at 12:39 AM
If you own a grocery store and have 10 employees....you don't hire more cashiers just because your taxes are reduced. You hire when more people are spending more money in your store to justify hiring more staff and you hire regardless of what you pay in taxes. It's called supply and demand...perhaps you have heard of this? Your republican philosophy is beyond flawed and it is ever disturbing that you and those like you don't see that. Tax cuts for the wealthy help them free up money to pay off their beemers quicker....it does not cause them to hire people needlessly when the cash flow in does not justify the expense going out.
Momiac October 05, 2012 at 12:46 AM
Truly sorry to hear of your husband's condition. I lost a 50 year old sister to lung cancer, and I miss her so... However, Romney's not the liar. Sadly, Obama's nose should be 14 states beyond his face for all of the untruths he's told.
Momiac October 05, 2012 at 12:48 AM
Folks- Obama is the problem, not the gentleman struggling with an awful disease. Prayers for the sick, and determination to elect the right candidate for our great Nation. Please. Let's try to be civil.
Maria October 05, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Changes to existing laws --like being able to buy out of state insurance to make the industry more competitive, would solve some of our problems today. Allowing government to run our LIVES, from conception to death, as well and efficiently as government runs the Post Office and Amtrak, would be a health DISASTER for all. Wake up, folks!
Joseph Romano October 05, 2012 at 07:09 PM
Romney is a liar. The economy is getting better. You think for one moment he cares about you or the country when he has his money in off shore accounts
Roman Gabriel October 05, 2012 at 07:18 PM
Your an idiot. . . .
Nick October 05, 2012 at 08:28 PM
Holy smokes Mary do you just parrott everything Mitt says. How will interstate health insurance exchanges help exactly? And what about Mitt's claim that this is a state issue? So you want to let the states handle it instead of handle it at the federal level, then you want to open up an interstate exchange which puts it under federal jurisdication? Just more Mitt cross talk. The guy is clueless. And somehow that - in your very troubled mind - is the only alternative to "Allowing government to run our LIVES."?
Jim Aspen October 06, 2012 at 01:51 AM
The magazine's Oct. 15 cover features Mitt Romney debating an empty chair instead of President Barack Obama, just as Clint Eastwood did at the Republican National Convention. “This image seemed like a proper response to the first Presidential debate, but I’m not sure I realized how hard it is to caricature furniture," Barry Blitt told The New Yorker about his cover, “One on One." http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/the-new-yorker-eastwooding-137676.html?hp=r1
Jim Aspen October 06, 2012 at 10:22 AM
Jay Leno goes after the President again. Early in his opening monologue, the NBC Tonight Show host said of the stellar television ratings for Wednesday night's debate, "The only person who didn't tune in, I think, was President Obama" What a crowd! Man! Yeah! You sound like Republicans watching last night's debate. Oh, my gosh. Well, the consensus is Mitt Romney won the presidential debate last night. The only people that thought Obama won - the replacement refs. Those are the only ones. They're saying close to 60 million people may have watched the debate. In fact, the only person who didn't tune in, I think, was President Obama. What happened? [Laughter] Even Tony Romo was going, “What happened?”
John Fernandes October 06, 2012 at 01:14 PM
Big Turd wants to fund his tax cut on the back of Big Bird. Mitt and Ann refuse to show their tax returns for 2005-2009, since their accountants said they paid about 14%, the only reason to hide those returns is the IRS amnesty for rich tax cheats with secret Swiss accounts. After the UBS whistle blower case the IRS let rich tax cheats "pay the fine" instead of trial for the felony they committed. Maybe they should be in the big house rather than the White House.
Bushy Buck October 19, 2012 at 09:27 PM
Monkey Business! Yeah him ( Romney) and Bain Capital create Jobs alright! To bad there in China! These so called "Job Creators have had more then 10 years to create some jobs! All they did is stuff their pockets at the Middle Classes expense!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »